|
Reviews of the declaration
St. Thomas Aquinas on Eucharistic miracles
Responses to the declaration
Church dogmas on the Eucharist
The
Holy Eucharst is The Whole Christ
Problems
in the declaration
In
Italy in 2001
Bishop
Roman Danylak's letter
|

|
Archbishop of Kwangju Archdiocese covering Naju made it official on January 1, 1998, that the events in Naju contradicted the Church doctrines and, therefore, could not be recognized as true revelations from God.
Serious questions remain, however, because it has become clear that the Naju Investigating Committee in the Kwangju Archdiocese did not conduct any substantive investigation and based its negative recommendation on an incorrect presentation of the Church teaching.
The Kwangju Declaration states that the species of bread and wine must remain unchanged even after the consecration of bread and wine by priests and, therefore, that the Eucharistic miracles in Naju do not conform to the Church doctrine.
|
|

|
After witnessing
the Eucharistic miracle through Julia Kim at the Vatican on Oct 31, 1995, the Holy Father is giving a
blessing to Julia and touching her cheek.
|
|
|
By distorting the authentic Church teaching, this assertion precludes the possibility of divine intervention to reveal the true reality of the Blessed Sacrament, which is the substantial presence of the Lord’s Body and Blood together with His Soul and Divinity in the Eucharist and, therefore, in effect rejects all of the Eucharistic miracles in Church history.
If all the Eucharistic miracles are rejected, people’s faith in the Church teaching on the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Eucharist will also weaken.
Thus, the Kwangju Declaration on Naju contains an encroachment on the Church teaching on the Eucharist itself. More...
|
|